Only through reflecting, and the positioning between
those two extremities, will there be forward steps in the relationship. Better said, why speak of relationships when we can talk about meeting?
It is by meeting the other that I see who I am, that I see how I act, how I think, and react. It is through this
communication (that in Latin could mean “put in common”) that
commitment appears (“sending myself to the other”).
And how do two lives become one, one twofold life? Some great thinkers affirm that the human being is a giving being. That means, the same way it is the nature of the fountain to outpour water, showing itself alive and transmitting life, it is the nature of the human being to endow himself incessantly – endow his richness, endow his time, his energy, his values, his support and his love to all those surrounding him.
Nevertheless, it needs preparation; a firm and conscious effort of self-knowledge and knowledge of the other. It is this way that, once more, we come to the meeting.
It is in this meeting that the “I” and the “You” transcend to a monadic “We” in which the human being becomes able to overcome his limits.
Knowing the other means knowing myself; because I reflect myself on the other, as a shadow that manifests itself only when there is a light to shine.
And this light might well be Love! A love that should not be blind, but, once again, conscious!
And the problem comes when love, which is born blind, wants to remain blind– or better – when we insist to remain blind, afraid of knowing the real character of the other, the companion we have idealized, afraid that knowing we no longer want him/her; afraid of being abandoned; afraid of solitude: afraid!
Sam Cyrous
(published in Psicologia Actual, Portugal, March 2006).
Labels: communication, couples, fear, human nature, love, relationships, self-knowledge, transcendence